FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
December 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Nov   Jan »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Monthly archives
Escape of the weasel?
Why is this man smiling? Because felony charges against him were dismissed today!
Why is this man smiling? Because felony charges against him were dismissed today!
A District Court judge today dismissed the felony charges against Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki, known affectionately to us as “The Weasel.” It wasn’t immediately clear why Judge Valerie Adair dismissed the charges against Krolicki and his former chief of staff in the state treasurer’s office, but it was clear she did so “without prejudice,” which means prosecutors can re-file the charges at a later time.

Krolicki was charged with misappropriating public funds, in that he ordered companies doing business with the state not to deposit funds meant for marketing of two college savings programs into state coffers, but to hold them back to be spent at Krolicki’s direction. That direction was to create ads featuring the face of Krolicki, aka free advertising for Krolicki’s ultimately successful re-election bid. No funds were missing; they were merely spent in ways not authorized by law. (We wrote about it — extensively — back when a state audit revealed the crime.)

UPDATE: KLAS Channel 8 reporter Jonathan Humbert has more details on the dismissal, with a brief note saying Adair dismissed the case because the state failed to show Krolicki used the misappropriated funds for his own gain.

Hmmm, let’s see if we can follow this logic chain: Krolicki is a politician. Politicians ply their trade by advertising their good works. Advertising costs money. Money is notoriously hard to come by, requiring many hours of repetitive phone calls, fundraisers, etc. Krolicki used the powers of his office to take money that was supposed to be deposited into state accounts to instead be spent specifically on ads featuring himself. Those ads saved him millions that he’d otherwise have to have raised himself, or done without. All of which was done knowingly, willfully and intentionally in contravention of well-established state procedures, with which Krolicki was well-familiar.

Yes, it really is hard to see how Krolicki benefited himself in this scheme, huh? Judges still have to go to law school in Nevada, right? They didn’t change that rule while we were on vacation last week, did they?

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
5 Responses to “Escape of the weasel?”

Oh, I forgot to add that the union man’s lover was a transvestite. And, like a transvestite, Krolicki may not be what he appears to be.

Written by: J.T. on Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2009 at 7:04 AM

The Brian Krolicki saga reminds me of a scene from “Last Exit to Brooklyn”. A small-time union organizer has been spending union funds on an expensive affair with a new lover. Eventually, his boss catches on to the situation. To defend himself, the spendthrift Casanova holds up a mass of papers and says, “But I’ve got receipts for everything!”

It’s true there’s no money missing from the College Savings Program, but that isn’t the issue.

Suppose you’re an assistant manager at the DMV. One day, you notice that office supplies are running low, so you tell the clerks to hold on to any cash they take in. Once there’s enough, you head to the office supply store and buy four times as many pens as the division’s budget allows. Then you buy the correct amount of printer paper, but pay nearly twice as much as you’re supposed to. Do you think your boss will be very understanding when you get back to the office?

I think that’s a reasonable analogy to the Krolicki situation. According to the state’s audit report, state money was not deposited into the state Treasury as required by law; instead, the Program Manager was told how to disperse the funds by the Treasurer’s office, bypassing the state’s accounting system. In a two-year period (2005-6), the Program’s advertising budget (set by the Legislature) was supposed to be $370,000; that budget was exceeded by more than $1.3 million. (Many of the resulting ads prominently featured Krolicki’s smiling face.) Earlier, in 2002, a law firm had been paid $428 an hour instead of the $225 contract rate, resulting in almost $96,000 in excess payments.

Instead of rallying around Krolicki, small-government conservatives ought to be asking themselves, “Is he really one of us?”

Written by: J.T. on Tuesday, Dec. 8, 2009 at 6:41 AM

I am still trying to figure out how being a Republican has anything to do with this issue. I am a registered Republican and I am plenty mad that ANY person in an elected office does not do right by the electorate. You just don’t get it…there is no difference between the two major politcal parties.

Written by: necpa57 on Monday, Dec. 7, 2009 at 5:06 PM

Thank you Judge Adair (you are now 2-0 in your support of Krolicki), for doing away with the need for a jury trial!

Who knew that the finding of fact actually has resided with the judge and not the jury all these centuries?!

Written by: Frank L on Monday, Dec. 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM

Republicans whine and scream all the time over “government waste”, but how is it that they never complain when one of their own spends our tax dollars on his political campaign? The irony never ceases to amaze me.

Written by: atdleft on Monday, Dec. 7, 2009 at 12:42 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics