FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
May 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Monthly archives
Dude, go back to Montana

Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer was in town recently to attend an energy conference, do a little gambling and explain why the chairman of the Democratic Governors Association has decided to abandon democracy.

According to the Review-Journal’s Political Notebooker Molly Ball, Schweitzer said that he’d be backing Clark County Commission Chairman Rory Reid for governor in 2010 over Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, “…despite the association’s general policy of primary neutrality.”

It seems Rory Reid’s father, U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, has been a longtime political mentor of Schweitzer’s, and he has a relationship with the Reid family.

As a result, we get this: “Full disclosure: I met with Rory; I am not meeting with the other candidate,” Schweitzer said. (We’re sure he knows “the other candidate” has a name, and it’s Barbara Buckley.)

Now, we have nothing bad to say about Rory Reid. We’ve known him for several years, and he’s always impressed us as an intelligent, ethical and dedicated politician. In our view, he’d make an excellent governor. On the other hand, we think Buckley is every bit as sharp, knows the legislative process, has a genuine heart for helping people and can be as tough as Carson City requires a person to be.

But that’s not the point here. The decision about who will represent the Democratic Party in the 2010 gubernatorial race does not belong to Schweitzer, or Rory Reid, or Harry Reid. It belongs to the hundreds of thousands of Democratic primary voters in Nevada. They’re the ones who will decide between Rory Reid and Buckley.

And, not for nothing, but we think it’s totally ass (as the young people say) for the guy in charge of electing Democrats to governors mansions nationwide to come out and favor one candidate over another more than a year before the primary election is even held. It smacks of intimidation, of good old boy, backroom politics. And we’re not sure how they do things up in Montana, but here in Nevada, voters tend not to like that kind of thing. Especially Democratic primary voters. Just ask U.S. Rep. Dina Titus, who enjoyed their generous support in 2006.

So, Gov. Schweitzer, with all due respect, drop your money on the tables and then fly back to Montana. We’ll call you next year, once we’ve decided who best to defeat the Republican nominee, OK? And then we expect you to make with the campaign cash — regardless of who we pick, even if it’s not the candidate you like — because, well, that’s your job.

But hey, thanks for visiting.

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
6 Responses to “Dude, go back to Montana”

“Every day, people in Reno wake up wondering how people in Las Vegas are going to screw them over. And every day, people in Las Vegas wake up … and don’t give Reno a second thought.”

ROTFLMAO. So very, very true.

Written by: Dex knows on Tuesday, May. 5, 2009 at 10:55 AM

Whoa, RM! Hold your horses! We may live in Las Vegas, but we’re not telling you Northern Nevadans for whom to vote! We said Nevada’s Democratic primary voters — all Democratic primary voters, no matter where they live in Nevada — will be the ones who decide who the nominee is. As it turns out, most of those voters live in Clark and Washoe counties, so you’re in the mix.

This does tend to support a pet theory of ours, however: Every day, people in Reno wake up wondering how people in Las Vegas are going to screw them over. And every day, people in Las Vegas wake up … and don’t give Reno a second thought.

Written by: Steve Sebelius on Tuesday, May. 5, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Harry Reid on the ticket and Rory Reid o the ticket… money from around the country coming in to knock off Harry, since he’s the Leader in the Senate… don’t you think that will bleed over to Rory? Why not have Rory run for Congress (in 2010 with the new seat), or better yet, surprise us all with Harry’s retirement and Rory’s running for dad’s seat – and leave the hard work of running the state to someone who knows there’s more to the state than the exclusive areas of LV and Henderson. And who has brains and can solve problems (although she’s being too cautious right now – I hope she steps it up soon). GO Buckley!

Written by: Lisa on Tuesday, May. 5, 2009 at 6:41 AM

You Las Vegans. There you go, thinking you get to tell the rest of us who to vote for. So far, I don’t know much about Rory Reid but I’m not impressed with the lack of guts in the Nevada Legislature which can be interpreted to mean, Buckley isn’t grabbing my attention.

Good thing we have several months of campaigning ahead of us.

Written by: RM on Monday, May. 4, 2009 at 11:51 PM

WHAT? Democrats dysfunctionally misbehaving and not even following their own rules, you know, even “generally” – I’m shocked, Shocked, SHOCKED!

I like Rory Reid too – but, we need him to stay where he is doing a great job as the Chair of the Clark County Commissioners to keep guys like Tom Collins in-line!

For too long the Nevada State Democratic Party has set the standard bar far too low by their stated purpose of “Being United, Organizing Volunteers, Raising Money and Electing Democrats” – I mean, really, how long is that old tired line going to be re-cycled?

How about we get really serious about being united (say, around our issues as stated in our political plank platform) AND organizing (you know, actually doing some recruiting and training people), AND raising some serious revenue AND electing the BEST Democrats?

Instead of intimidating people not to run for office, and stuffing the ballot box with bogus proxy votes and “selecting” who represents us as precinct captains, and “selecting” who gets to be the NSDP Chair and Executive Board – why not start having real ELECTIONS in Nevada? Hey, we could even have those debate and Q & A thingies before people vote!

I know, I know, I’m being an idealist!

Well, “that’s what primaries are for” is the standard party line response – but, the primary process should not be adulterated! It’s amazing that few want to legalize prostitution in our large urban counties – but, our patriotism and poltics is fully prostituted!

When are we going to learn to set aside our personal feelings and look at the facts and support the best qualified Democrats?

Rory Reid thinks he’s the best GUY for the job – but, that’s not the point when a better WOMAN candidate is running!

I’ll be with the majority of Nevada’s progressives and supporting Barbara Buckley!

Written by: Johnathan L. Abbinett on Monday, May. 4, 2009 at 12:28 PM

Typical. That kind of garbage is exactly why I voted for Dina in 2006, even though I liked Gibson more. The Reid machine (aka the Nevada State Democratic Party) does that in legislative races too. Looks like I will be voting for Buckley, after all (I was leaning to Rory, but will simply not support this type of crapola). Will they ever learn? Maybe we really do need to get rid of Harry.

Written by: Dex knows on Monday, May. 4, 2009 at 7:47 AM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics