FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
February 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  
Monthly archives
No, not that NRSC; the other one

Assemblyman Ty Cobb sure likes to join groups. To be more specific, he likes to create groups. During December’s special session, Cobb created the “Assembly Conservative Caucus,” which silently abstained from voting on Assemblywoman Barbara Buckley for speaker. And now he’s formed an all-new club, to be known as the Nevada Republican Study Committee, or NRSC.

Now, for those of you who follow politics, you’ll recognize those initials as belonging to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the group formerly headed by our very own U.S. Sen. John Ensign. (Those were the guys who lost seven, no, make that eight Senate seats to the Democrats in 2008.) So, right off, we see copyright, trademark infringement and other legal problems.

What is the study committee going to study, you ask? Good question. Let’s let Cobb answer by quoting his release:

Carson City, Nevada – A group of Republican members of the state Assembly announced today the formation of the Nevada Republican Study Committee (NRSC) dedicated to advancing a constitutional, fiscally conservative, limited government agenda in the 75th session of the Nevada Legislature.

The founding members are state Assemblymen Ty Cobb, Ed Goedhart, Don Gustavson, Dick McArthur and John Hambrick. Cobb will serve as chairman and Goedhart as vice chairman.

“The NRSC will focus on developing legislation and policy positions on key issues which will provide meaningful solutions to the problems hardworking Nevadans and their families face each day” said Cobb. “We’ll especially concentrate on issues dealing with the budget, appropriations, taxes, education, deregulation and general government reform.”

The NRSC will generally review and evaluate legislation using the following five guiding principles:

1) Does the bill reduce government regulations, reduce the size of government, eliminate entitlements, or eliminate unnecessary programs?

2) Does the bill reduce taxes or fees?

3) Does the bill encourage responsible behavior by individuals and families and encourage them to provide for their own health, safety, education or general welfare?

4) Doest the bill increase opportunities for individuals or families to decide, without hindrance or coercion from government, how to conduct their own lives and make personal choices?

5) Does the bill enhance the power of parents and guardians to rear their own children without excessive interference from the government?

“The NRSC was not created to compete with or replace the established Republican Assembly caucus,” concluded Goedhart, “but to help develop and advance a bold conservative agenda in the Nevada Legislature. We fully intend to work cooperatively with all members of the Legislature, both Democrat and Republican in both chambers, whenever possible without violating our core philosophical beliefs.”

Now, you may be asking yourself this: Since the libertarian-leaning Republicans in the lower house probably think that nearly every bill — in one way or another — violates these rules, what the hell is left for them to work cooperatively on? Maybe some small thing, a ceremonial gesture, something that they don’t have the votes to change anyway, like, oh, say, election of officers for the chamber?

Oh, right.

Well, anyway, they formed a study committee today, and Ty Cobb gets to be in another group. We’ll bet his resume is thick!

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
11 Responses to “No, not that NRSC; the other one”

Hey Dave….if Beers would use “google” for his info, like us peons, instead of getting his info from Chuck Myth, he might of had a chance of being re-elected.

Written by: John on Friday, Feb. 20, 2009 at 7:31 AM

P.S.

I would be remiss not to thank John for citing the source of my argument! THANKS!

Hopefully BEERS can read a simple one paragraph item from the TaxFoundation;

“Nevada’s State/Local Tax Burden Second-Lowest in Nation
During the past three decades, Nevada’s state and local tax burden has consistently ranked among the nation’s lowest. Currently estimated at 6.6% of income, Nevada’s state/local tax burden percentage ranks 49th highest nationally, well below the national average of 9.7%. Nevadans pay $3,245 per capita in state and local taxes.”
[SOURCE: taxfoundation.org]

Written by: dave404 on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009 at 4:17 PM

There is Beers swerving off course again and pushing a straw men up for a fig leaf of an excuse to explain his derangement!

Nevada has the lowest state and local tax burden in the Union (alright, Alaskans get a check every year, so they are really the lowest), and BEERS says that we are 25th in spending. But, hey BOB, I wasn’t talking about spending, was I? NO. The rest of Nevada knows that outsiders provide many dollars toward our general fund and thus it takes the burden off of us….but you twist things to try and further your ideology, and that is one of the reason you were tossed out of office by a “no-nothing nobody”, because we would rather have a hat placed in your ex Senate chair than your lying a**!

You kinda suck at repudiating facts.

Written by: dave404 on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM

Hey Beers, read some more info…can’t you read?

http://www.taxfoundation.org/research/topic/42.html

Written by: John on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009 at 6:15 AM

With all that knowledge and superiority Bobby, why weren’t you re-elected? I just can’t figure it out. Maybe you should ride the coat tails of your buddies Cobb and Muth…their are some real winners. Actually, can you help Muth out with his bankruptcy issues?

Written by: John on Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009 at 6:13 AM

Jeepers, Dave, lowest state-and-local tax burden? We’re 25th in per-capita state and local spending. Can’t you read a simple 12-page Tax Foundation study?

(Reference: http://nevadataxpayer.com/archives/4 – yes, I cite sources)

Say, isn’t “404″ the Apache server code for “File Not Found?”

Written by: Bob Beers on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009 at 6:26 PM

Charlie Brown Muth is now the defacto chairman of the Nevada GOP, so, what will Raggio do about this? Will he dump Lowden at the State convention this Spring? Or, will the Nevada GOP continue to grow more inbred and more isolated over time?

I look forward to the time that every republican businessperson foreswears ALL government business/contracts?

I look forward to Goedhart and Muth homeschooling their children without a government subsidy. ‘Cause the Nevada Constitution requires a “public” education and not vouchers to private schools.

Honest to goodness, Nevada has the smallest government workforce per capita and the lowest state and local tax burden of ALL states in the Union…and yet, it is too big a burden for these people [Charlie Brown Muth et.al.]…so, I challenge them to move to whereever it is cheaper to live! GO! And take your cows with you.

Written by: dave404 on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009 at 5:44 PM

C’mon, now, senator, where’s your sense of humor? You’d actually start to wonder about us if we didn’t make fun of these things, wouldn’t you? Besides, we are totally fair: We’d make fun of them for going against the private-sector union flow, too! Plus, you have to admit, they are more Keystone Cops than Dirty Harry, no?

Assembly Dick Committee. We like that.

Written by: Steve Sebelius on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009 at 8:04 AM

Perhaps Cobb could form the ADC (Assembly Dick Committee) of which he clearly has a track record to be the leader. At least Muth has some BFF’s to hang with here in beautiful Carson City.

Written by: Eric on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009 at 7:44 AM

Who wouldn’t make fun of these guys? Cobb is a idiot, out of touch with Nevada like Beers. Bobby forgets who won the election, those union members that voted democratic, why wouldn’t they? Why would they vote anti-labor conservatives. Listen to raggio on the radio this morning saying how republican “extremists” are out of control. He was reffering to Muth/Cobb, the black sheep of the party. No one will listen to these guys, all talk.

Written by: John on Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009 at 7:34 AM

Whew! I was beginning to worry no one in the media would make fun of these guys for going against the government-union flow.

Thanks!

Written by: Bob Beers on Tuesday, Feb. 17, 2009 at 10:55 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics