FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
January 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
Monthly archives
CityBlog lends its dubious endorsement to these fine Internet products.
Lights out

It’s official: The Huntridge Theater will not become a second-hand store. At least not right now. The Las Vegas Planning Commission unanimously denied on Jan. 10 an application to turn the historic building into a used furniture store. The applicant, Cima Mizrachi, has 10 days to file an appeal with the Las Vegas City Council.

Mizrachi said the store would be more like an antique shop than a flea market. It would provide the owners, who are members of her family, with income to repair the dilapidated building.

“We need to make some sort of income,” she said. “Otherwise we can’t afford to do the improvements we intended to do.”

Neither neighbors nor commissioners bought it. Native and near-native Las Vegans love the Huntridge Theater, but it has fallen into tragic disrepair under the Mizrachis’ ownership — although, to be fair, the decline started before they bought it in 2002. Some members of the community consider the building’s disrepair to be an ongoing civic insult. They brought pictures of graffiti, rubble, broken windows and chinks in the stucco.

“[The Huntridge] unfortunately remains sort of a lingering, remaining punch in the nose for downtown redevelopment,” said Donald Hickey.

Cima’s brother Eli wanted to revive the Huntridge as a retail space in 2008, and gained widespread community support before the economy collapsed. Nothing ever came of it. Instead, the owners installed a furniture store and cell towers, both sanctioned by the city council. None of the promised improvements ever happened. The planning commissioners told Mizrachi no more permits would be approved until she fixes up the outside of the building. They decided turning the Huntridge into a second-hand store would just hasten its demise.

Several Mizrachi opponents speculated the family is holding the crumbling property until 2017, when a historic covenant expires that bars them from demolishing the theater. Mizrachi insisted that she loves the theater and wants to have it restored. But she needs money to do it. The state has already provided more than $1 million to keep the building standing.

While the commissioners discussed the project, they shared favorite memories of the Huntridge. It felt more like a eulogy than a celebration, as they despaired of ever finding the money to resurrect the stage.

“Our experience with Kiel Ranch shows us that if you ignore a building long enough, it will just fall apart,” said Commissioner Glenn Trowbridge. “I think that the continued neglect of the property, in five more quick years, it’ll just fall down.”

Outside the meeting, several people involved with efforts to save the Huntridge confronted Mizrachi about her family’s treatment of the building. The argument briefly turned into a shouting match before Mizrachi stormed out of the courtyard. It didn’t look a good beginning to any kind of dialogue.

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
2 Responses to “Lights out”

This will go the same way as Moulin Rouge. Buying listed buildings scares off buyers. This current situation would scare off any investor.
The commission needs to work with the owners to ease restrictions for a potential sale, otherwise it sits as it is for five years or falls down.

Written by: mark.couper on Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012 at 11:59 AM

I understand the local objections, but they are running out of options. The historical protections mean there is a reluctance of potential buyers. The Mazrachi’s should never have bought the place but no one else was interested and their original intention was reopen as a live music venue. Sadly the costs were prohibitive.
The protections surrounding the building mean that there is little interest in buying the property. The costs of buying and redeveloping with the current protections are estimated at over $10m.
I don’t think there is any way forward, the rules to protect are the same rule that will kill the property and cause the current impasse.

Written by: teed off on Wednesday, Jan. 11, 2012 at 7:23 AM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics