FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
April 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Mar   May »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Monthly archives
CityBlog lends its dubious endorsement to these fine Internet products.
Torture judge hires a lawyer

Jay Bybee, the federal judge and UNLV law professor who signed off on a series of Bush administration torture memos in 2002, could find himself in deep legal shit by year’s end.

Two days after CityLife asked how Bybee, the respected jurist who headed up the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel from 2001 to 2003, could have approved America’s torture of suspected terrorists, the same Spanish judge who went after former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet opened a probe of the conduct of Bybee and other Bush administration lawyers.

Today, Cal Law reports Bybee has hired Maureen Mahoney of global heavyweight law firm Latham & Watkins to help him defend against the Spanish probe and, presumably, against any future charges he might face as a result of forthcoming internal Justice Department probe.

(Note: Cal Law requires you to register to view the article, but registration is free)

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
One Response to “Torture judge hires a lawyer”

Are you aware that the mastermind of the 9/11 plot cracked under waterboarding? Here is the information obtained by the interrogators.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/03/14/guantanamo.mohammed/index.html

Also, have you considered that the Germans of the 1940s and the Muslim fanatics of the 2000s come from radically different cultures which might require radically different methods of interrogation? It is clear that the proper methods of interrogation should be to use whatever works to achieve the goals of preventing acts of terrorism. These barbarians are outside the rules of warfare (unlike the German uniformed combatants) and are thus not subject to the same prohibitions against mistreatment. As such, they may be even be summarily executed as was traditionally the case in situations of non-uniformed combatants. I suggest you read Ex Parte Quirin for more:
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=317&page=1

Written by: Bill on Wednesday, Apr. 15, 2009 at 9:41 AM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics